Several things are notable about this structure.
Full Document My Fellow Citizens: During the course of his remarks my name was mentioned in such a way, as I suppose renders it at least not improper that I should make some sort of reply to him. I shall not attempt to follow him in the precise order in which he addressed the assembled multitude upon that occasion, though I shall perhaps do so in the main.
A Question of Veracity—The Alliance. There was one question to which he asked the attention of the crowd, which I deem of somewhat less importance—at least of propriety for me to dwell upon—than the others, which he brought in near the close of his speech, and which I think it would not be entirely proper for me to omit attending to, Lincoln and douglas debates yet if I were not to give some attention to it now, I should probably forget it altogether.
While I am upon this subject, allow me to say that I do not intend to indulge in that inconvenient mode sometimes adopted in public speaking, of reading from documents; but I shall depart from that rule so far as to read a little scrap from his speech, which notices this first topic of which I shall speak—that is, provided I can find it in the paper.
Examines the Press and Tribune of this morning. I intend to fight that Lincoln and douglas debates army wherever I meet them. I know they deny the alliance, but yet these men who are trying to divide the Democratic party for the purpose of electing a Republican Senator in my place, are just as much the agents and tools of the supporters of Mr.
Hence I shall deal with this allied army just as the Russians dealt with the allies at Sebastopol—that is, the Russians did not stop to inquire, when they fired a broadside, whether it hit an Englishman, a Frenchman, or a Turk.
Nor will I stop to inquire, nor shall I hesitate, whether my blows shall hit these Republican leaders or their allies who are holding the federal offices and yet acting in concert with them.
Well now, gentlemen, is not that very alarming? Why, my friend, the Judge is not only as it turns out, not a dead lion, nor even a living one—he is the rugged Russian Bear! For my part, I have to say, that whether there be such an alliance, depends, so far as I know, upon what may be a right definition of the term alliance.
If for the Republican party to see the other great party to which they are opposed divided among themselves, and not try to stop the division and rather be glad of it—if that is an alliance I confess I am in; but if it is meant to be said that the Republicans had formed an alliance going beyond that, by which there is contribution of money or sacrifice of principle on the one side or the other, so far as the Republican party is concerned, if there be any such thing, I protest that I neither know anything of it, nor do I believe it.
I will however say—as I think this branch of the argument is lugged in—I would before I leave it, state, for the benefit of those concerned, that one of those same Buchanan men did once tell me of an argument that he made for his opposition to Judge Douglas. He said that a friend of our Senator Douglas had been talking to him, and had among other things said to him: I believe his original Nebraska bill was right in the abstract, but it was wrong in the time that it was brought forward.
It was wrong in the application to a territory in regard to which the question had been settled; it was brought forward at a time when nobody asked him; it was tendered to the South when the South had not asked for it, but when they could not well refuse it; and for this same reason he forced that question upon our party: I have only been stating to you the argument of a Buchanan man.
You will judge if there is any force in it. What is popular sovereignty? We recollect that at an early period in the history of this struggle, there was another name for this same thing—Squatter Sovereignty. It was not exactly Popular Sovereignty but Squatter Sovereignty.
What do those terms mean? What do those terms mean when used now? And vast credit is taken by our friend, the Judge, in regard to his support of it, when he declares the last years of his life have been, and all the future years of his life shall be, devoted to this matter of popular sovereignty.
Why, it is the sovereignty of the people!
What was Squatter Sovereignty? What has become of that Squatter Sovereignty? What has become of it? Can you get anybody to tell you now that the people of a territory have any authority to govern themselves, in regard to this mooted question of Slavery, before they form a State Constitution?
No such thing at all, although there is a general running fire, and although there has been a hurrah made in every speech on that side, assuming that policy had given the people of a territory the right to govern themselves upon this question yet the point is dodged. To-day it has been decided—no more than a year ago it was decided by the Supreme Court of the United States, and is insisted upon to-day, that the people of a territory have no right to exclude Slavery from a territory, that if any one man chooses to take slaves into a territory, all the rest of the people have no right to keep them out.
This being so, and this decision being made one of the points that the Judge approved, and one in the approval of which he says he means to keep me down—put me down I should not say, for I have never been up. He says he is in favor of it, and sticks to it, and expects to win his battle on that decision, which says that there is no such thing as Squatter Sovereignty; but that any one man may take slaves into a territory, and all the other men in the territory may be opposed to it, and yet by reason of the constitution they cannot prohibit it.
When that is so, how much is left of this vast matter of Squatter Sovereignty I should like to know? Kansas was settled, for example, in It was a territory yet, without having formed a Constitution, in a very regular way, for three years.
All this time negro slavery could be taken in by any few individuals, and by that decision of the Supreme Court, which the Judge approves, all the rest of the people cannot keep it out; but when they come to make a Constitution they may say they will not have Slavery.
But it is there; they are obliged to tolerate it in some way, and all experience shows that it will be so—for they will not take the negro slaves and absolutely deprive the owners of them.Find out more about the history of Lincoln-Douglas Debates, including videos, interesting articles, pictures, historical features and more.
Get all the facts on grupobittia.com The Lincoln-Douglas Debates: The First Complete, Unexpurgated Text [Harold Holzer] on grupobittia.com *FREE* shipping on qualifying offers.
The seven debates between Abraham Lincoln and Stephen Douglas held during the Illinois senatorial race of are among the most important statements in American political history/5(32).
LINCOLN-DOUGLAS DEBATE MUSEUM Take I toward Decatur and then take a leisurely country drive on Route through Mattoon, pick up Route 16 into Charleston ( miles) and start your visit at the Lincoln-Douglas Debate Museum.
This museum is the only one in Illinois that retraces the debates.
The 7th and final debate between Senatorial candidates Abraham Lincoln and Stephen Douglas was held on October 15, , in Alton, Illinois. Today bronze statues of Douglas and Lincoln stand to commemorate the event at Lincoln Douglas Square in Alton. In , as the country moved ever closer to.
Debate Formats. There are several different formats for debate practiced in high school and college debate leagues. Most of these formats share some general features. The Lincoln-Douglas debates were a series of formal political debates between the challenger, Abraham Lincoln, and the incumbent, Stephen A.
Douglas, in a campaign for one of Illinois' two United States Senate seats. Although Lincoln lost the election, these debates launched him into national.